sunnuntai 17. marraskuuta 2013

Georges St-Pierre versus Johny Hendricks was not that bad

"Oh, worst robbery ever" - Nope.
"Johny won so clearly" - Nope.
"Georges St-Pierre was totally dominated" - Nope.

Please, this was a bad decision, but not that bad. You know, that Hendricks winning would of been just as bad. So what I'm saying is that this fight was a draw. This fight had to be a draw, but this decision showed how stupid the judging is. They don't want to give draw rounds while it clearly would sometimes be the best possible choice.J

Here I only score the rounds that fans gave for the challenger.

1:
Georges: minor strikes, takedown, failed guillotine choke.
Hendricks: minor strikes, elbows from takedown defense, takedown.

3:
Georges: good counter left hook, more active
Hendricks: takedown

5:
Georges: few good strikes, two takedowns, more active
Hendricks:


So why give it for anyone, when the fight was a draw?

Ei kommentteja:

Lähetä kommentti